Center for Orthopaedics

25.0k citations
467 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 51
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment 37
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 36
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 32
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 31

Center for Orthopaedics

410 papers receiving 22.4k citations

Peers

Center for Orthopaedics
Comparison fields: 5 of 198
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 2.0k
  • Internal Medicine 713
  • Surgery 7.3k
  • Oncology 4.4k
  • Cancer Research 2.4k
Replace Saint Thomas Midtown Hospital with:
Saint Thomas Midtown Hospital United States
Cardiovascular Research Associates United States
Urology Team United States
Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group United States
Adventist Hinsdale Hospital United States
Springfield Clinic United States
Adult and Pediatric Dermatology United States
The US Oncology Network United States
St. Joseph Medical Center United States
St. John's Hospital United States
Center for Orthopaedics relative to Saint Thomas Midtown Hospital United States Saint Thomas Midtown Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.5×
Saint Thomas Midtown Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Center for Orthopaedics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Center for Orthopaedics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Center for Orthopaedics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Center for Orthopaedics more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Center for Orthopaedics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Center for Orthopaedics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Center for Orthopaedics at the time of their publication.

About Center for Orthopaedics

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Center for Orthopaedics have published 467 papers, which have received a total of 25.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 59 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 211 papers in Surgery, 62 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 51 papers in Rheumatology and 20 papers in Rehabilitation on the topics of Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (52 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (51 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (38 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (37 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (36 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (34 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (32 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (31 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (2.0k citations), Internal Medicine (713 citations), Surgery (7.3k citations), Oncology (4.4k citations) and Cancer Research (2.4k citations). Authors at Center for Orthopaedics collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Gene Therapy and Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. Some of Center for Orthopaedics's most productive authors include Christopher H. Evans, Steven C. Ghivizzani, Jason C. Eck, Min A Yu, Shyamala Maheswaran, Shannon L. Stott, Mehmet Toner, Daniel A. Haber, Paul D. Robbins and Scott Dean Hodges.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact