Center for Free-Electron Laser Science
Impact in
- Structural Biology top 1%
- Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Radiation top 2%
- Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Papers in
-
- Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications 219
- Radiation 422
- Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques 368
- X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis 151
- Top scholars
- Ángel RubioHenry N. ChapmanFranz X. KärtnerRobin SantraMichael RuggenthalerMichael A. SentefOriol VendrellCarl Caleman
- Journals
- Physical Review Letters (95 papers)Physical review. B. (89 papers)Optics Express (66 papers)Physical review. A (60 papers)Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (51 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Center for Free-Electron Laser Science
1.9k papers receiving 51.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
- Structural Biology 4.9k
- Radiation 8.0k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 27.7k
- Spectroscopy 5.9k
- Condensed Matter Physics 3.9k
Countries citing scholars working at Center for Free-Electron Laser Science
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Center for Free-Electron Laser Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Center for Free-Electron Laser Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Center for Free-Electron Laser Science more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Center for Free-Electron Laser Science
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Center for Free-Electron Laser Science at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Center for Free-Electron Laser Science at the time of their publication.
About Center for Free-Electron Laser Science
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Center for Free-Electron Laser Science have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 52.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 219 papers in Structural Biology, 422 papers in Radiation, 1.2k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 177 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 229 papers in Spectroscopy on the topics of Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (404 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (368 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (271 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (269 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (246 papers), Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (219 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (151 papers) and X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (151 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Structural Biology (4.9k citations), Radiation (8.0k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (27.7k citations), Spectroscopy (5.9k citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (3.9k citations). Authors at Center for Free-Electron Laser Science collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B., Optics Express, Physical review. A and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. Some of Center for Free-Electron Laser Science's most productive authors include Ángel Rubio, Henry N. Chapman, Franz X. Kärtner, Robin Santra, Michael Ruggenthaler, Michael A. Sentef, Oriol Vendrell, Carl Caleman, R. J. Dwayne Miller and Nicolas Tancogne-Dejean.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.