Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
-
- Global trade and economics
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Economic Theory and Policy
Papers in
-
- Economic Theory and Policy 224
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 146
- Global trade and economics 138
- Top scholars
- Claude MénardSandra PoncetMarc LavoieAlex CoadMichel GrabischThierry MayerGunther CAPELLE-BLANCARDCiprian A. Tudor
- Journals
- Journal of Mathematical Economics (42 papers)Economic Theory (31 papers)Journal of Economic Theory (23 papers)Mathematical Social Sciences (21 papers)Theory and Decision (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne
2.6k papers receiving 39.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
- General Decision Sciences 1.6k
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7.1k
- Economics and Econometrics 18.4k
- Finance 6.1k
- Strategy and Management 5.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne at the time of their publication.
About Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne have published 3.2k papers, which have received a total of 42.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 122 papers in General Decision Sciences, 474 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 1.3k papers in Economics and Econometrics, 399 papers in Finance and 238 papers in Urban Studies on the topics of Economic theories and models (273 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (224 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (206 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (157 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (146 papers), Social Policies and Family (146 papers), Global trade and economics (138 papers) and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (125 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (1.6k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (7.1k citations), Economics and Econometrics (18.4k citations), Finance (6.1k citations) and Strategy and Management (5.6k citations). Authors at Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne collaborate with scholars in France, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Mathematical Economics, Economic Theory, Journal of Economic Theory, Mathematical Social Sciences and Theory and Decision. Some of Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne's most productive authors include Claude Ménard, Sandra Poncet, Marc Lavoie, Alex Coad, Michel Grabisch, Thierry Mayer, Gunther CAPELLE-BLANCARD, Ciprian A. Tudor, Rekha Rao and Laura Hering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.