Centre for Sight
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Papers in
- Ophthalmology 340
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 119
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 78
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 62
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments 61
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 48
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders 83
- Top scholars
- Santosh G HonavarVijaya K. GothwalMrittika SenSeelam BharaniKonrad PesudovsKaustubh MulayPaula K. YuDao‐Yi Yu
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (31 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (19 papers)Indian Journal of Ophthalmology (167 papers)Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (11 papers)Ophthalmology (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Centre for Sight
719 papers receiving 11.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
- Ophthalmology 4.1k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.2k
- Physiology 318
- Epidemiology 1.9k
- Nephrology 316
Countries citing scholars working at Centre for Sight
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre for Sight. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre for Sight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre for Sight more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centre for Sight
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre for Sight at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre for Sight at the time of their publication.
About Centre for Sight
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre for Sight have published 919 papers, which have received a total of 15.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 340 papers in Ophthalmology, 193 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 120 papers in Epidemiology, 82 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 23 papers in Dermatology on the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (119 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (83 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (78 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (75 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (62 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (61 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (59 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (48 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (4.1k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.2k citations), Physiology (318 citations), Epidemiology (1.9k citations) and Nephrology (316 citations). Authors at Centre for Sight collaborate with scholars in India, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica and Ophthalmology. Some of Centre for Sight's most productive authors include Santosh G Honavar, Vijaya K. Gothwal, Mrittika Sen, Seelam Bharani, Konrad Pesudovs, Kaustubh Mulay, Paula K. Yu, Dao‐Yi Yu, Stephen J. Cringle and Robert J. Unwin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.