National Metrology Center

262 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

National Metrology Center
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 251
  • Metals and Alloys 82
  • Drug Discovery 2
  • Spectroscopy 190
  • Analytical Chemistry 107
Replace Universidad Politécnica de Zacatecas with:
Universidad Politécnica de Zacatecas Mexico
Instituto Nacional de Electricidad y Energías Limpias Mexico
Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Ecatepec Mexico
Universidad Politécnica de Tulancingo Mexico
Universidad Marista Mexico
Universidad de Ecatepec Mexico
Engie (United States) United States
Element Six (United States) United States
Centro de Estudios Universitarios Adolfo López Mateos Mexico
Hexcel (United States) United States
National Metrology Center relative to Universidad Politécnica de Zacatecas Mexico Universidad Politécnica de Zacatecas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
Universidad Politécnica de Zacatecas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Metrology Center

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Metrology Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Metrology Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Metrology Center more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Metrology Center

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Metrology Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Metrology Center at the time of their publication.

About National Metrology Center

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Metrology Center have published 299 papers, which have received a total of 2.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 74 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 61 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 45 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 15 papers in Radiation and 58 papers in Biomedical Engineering on the topics of Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (74 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (35 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (30 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (29 papers), Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (28 papers), Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (26 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (18 papers) and Optical measurement and interference techniques (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (251 citations), Metals and Alloys (82 citations), Drug Discovery (2 citations), Spectroscopy (190 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (107 citations). Authors at National Metrology Center collaborate with scholars in Mexico, Brazil and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Metrologia, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Accreditation and Quality Assurance, Measurement and Optics Communications. Some of National Metrology Center's most productive authors include J. M. Juárez‐García, H. Herrera-Hernández, J. Uruchurtu, Manuel Palomar‐Pardavé, M. Romero‐Romo, J. Xamán, J. Arce, Natalya V. Likhanova, Josefina de Gyves and Baoshan Xing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact