Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 23
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 42
- Top scholars
- Mark A. BurgmanAnca Maria HaneaMarissa F. McBrideHugh Philip PossinghamTom KompasMichael C. RungeCindy E. HauserFiona M. Fidler
- Journals
- Ecological Applications (16 papers)Risk Analysis (14 papers)Diversity and Distributions (12 papers)Methods in Ecology and Evolution (11 papers)PLoS ONE (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis
277 papers receiving 11.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
- Ecological Modeling 1.4k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2k
- Ecology 2.8k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1.3k
- Global and Planetary Change 2.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis at the time of their publication.
About Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis have published 290 papers, which have received a total of 11.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 23 papers in Ecological Modeling, 50 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 41 papers in Insect Science, 21 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 27 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (42 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (27 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (26 papers), Biological Control of Invasive Species (25 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (23 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (22 papers), Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education (20 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (1.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2k citations), Ecology (2.8k citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (1.3k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (2.1k citations). Authors at Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis collaborate with scholars in Australia, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Ecological Applications, Risk Analysis, Diversity and Distributions, Methods in Ecology and Evolution and PLoS ONE. Some of Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis's most productive authors include Mark A. Burgman, Anca Maria Hanea, Marissa F. McBride, Hugh Philip Possingham, Tom Kompas, Michael C. Runge, Cindy E. Hauser, Fiona M. Fidler, Tara G. Martin and Bruce G. Marcot.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.