California Department of Food and Agriculture
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect behavior and control techniques
- Insect and Pesticide Research
-
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
- Insect Science 529
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 216
- Insect behavior and control techniques 155
- Insect and Pesticide Research 99
-
- Plant and animal studies 159
- Fossil Insects in Amber 105
- Top scholars
- Martin HauserSergei A. SubbotinShaun L. WintertonRobert H. PoppengaMohammad AtharBirgit PuschnerAndrew R. ClineMichael S. Filigenzi
- Journals
- Zootaxa (160 papers)Plant Disease (101 papers)Nematology (65 papers)Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (36 papers)Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation (35 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaChina
In The Last Decade
California Department of Food and Agriculture
1.6k papers receiving 30.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
- Insect Science 7.9k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 5.9k
- Plant Science 10.2k
- Horticulture 231
- Parasitology 1.4k
Countries citing scholars working at California Department of Food and Agriculture
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at California Department of Food and Agriculture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at California Department of Food and Agriculture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites California Department of Food and Agriculture more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at California Department of Food and Agriculture
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with California Department of Food and Agriculture at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with California Department of Food and Agriculture at the time of their publication.
About California Department of Food and Agriculture
In recent decades, authors affiliated with California Department of Food and Agriculture have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 31.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 529 papers in Insect Science, 502 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 605 papers in Plant Science, 13 papers in Horticulture and 320 papers in Ecology on the topics of Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (216 papers), Plant and animal studies (159 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (157 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (155 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (155 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (113 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (105 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (99 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Insect Science (7.9k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (5.9k citations), Plant Science (10.2k citations), Horticulture (231 citations) and Parasitology (1.4k citations). Authors at California Department of Food and Agriculture collaborate with scholars in United States, Russia and China and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, Plant Disease, Nematology, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology and Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. Some of California Department of Food and Agriculture's most productive authors include Martin Hauser, Sergei A. Subbotin, Shaun L. Winterton, Robert H. Poppenga, Mohammad Athar, Birgit Puschner, Andrew R. Cline, Michael S. Filigenzi, Richard Ko and Charles H. Pickett.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.