Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit

7.5k citations
241 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit

228 papers receiving 7.5k citations

Peers

Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Immunology and Allergy 434
  • Neurology 701
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 795
  • Cancer Research 545
  • Nephrology 239
Replace National Cancer Research Institute with:
National Cancer Research Institute United Kingdom
London Clinic United Kingdom
Centre Hospitalier de Bretagne Sud France
Maaslandziekenhuis Netherlands
Immunologie - Immunopathologie - Immunothérapie France
Blood Cancer UK United Kingdom
NIHR Birmingham Liver Biomedical Research Unit United Kingdom
MSD (Belgium) Belgium
Pharmo Institute Netherlands
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tivoli Belgium
Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit relative to National Cancer Research Institute United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.0×
National Cancer Research Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit at the time of their publication.

About Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit have published 241 papers, which have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 18 papers in Nephrology, 22 papers in Neurology, 13 papers in Statistics and Probability, 5 papers in Immunology and Allergy and 8 papers in Radiation on the topics of Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (14 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (11 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (9 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (8 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (7 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (6 papers) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (6 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Immunology and Allergy (434 citations), Neurology (701 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (795 citations), Cancer Research (545 citations) and Nephrology (239 citations). Authors at Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including BMJ Open, Annals of Oncology, Trials, PLoS ONE and British Journal of Cancer. Some of Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit's most productive authors include Simon J. Bond, Ian B. Wilkinson, Joseph Cheriyan, Angelos Georgiou Kolias, Wendi Qian, Thomas F. Hiemstra, Peter J. Hutchinson, David Cunningham, David C. Linch and Kirit M. Ardeshna.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact