Carlow University

235 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Carlow University
Comparison fields: 5 of 198
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 70
  • Biomaterials 366
  • Research and Theory 86
  • Information Systems and Management 190
  • Management Science and Operations Research 305
Replace George Brown College with:
George Brown College Canada
Lewin Group (United States) United States
Somerset Medical Center United States
Canada Research Chairs Canada
Seneca Polytechnic Canada
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation United States
VA Healthcare-VISN 4 United States
Conestoga College Canada
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health United States
Madonna University United States
Carlow University relative to George Brown College Canada George Brown College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.6×
George Brown College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Carlow University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Carlow University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Carlow University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carlow University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Carlow University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Carlow University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Carlow University at the time of their publication.

About Carlow University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Carlow University have published 255 papers, which have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 8 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 10 papers in Research and Theory, 30 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 2 papers in Leadership and Management and 12 papers in Biomaterials on the topics of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (28 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (11 papers), Nursing education and management (10 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (8 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (6 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (6 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (6 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Issues, ethics and legal aspects (70 citations), Biomaterials (366 citations), Research and Theory (86 citations), Information Systems and Management (190 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (305 citations). Authors at Carlow University collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and South Korea and have published in prestigious journals including JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, Journal of Voice, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Journal of Professional Nursing. Some of Carlow University's most productive authors include Enrique Mu, Milagros Pereyra-Rojas, Beth A. Zamboni, William C. Zamboni, Cynthia E. Coburn, Robert C. Binning, Alexis R. Lauricella, Courtney K. Blackwell, Ellen Ann Wartella and Michael B. Robb.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact