British Museum

103.6k citations
5.1k papers ·

Impact in

    • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
    • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
    • Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Archeology top 0.5%

Papers in

    • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 441
    • Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis 265

British Museum

4.5k papers receiving 97.5k citations

Peers

British Museum
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Paleontology 24.9k
  • Archeology 1.9k
  • Archeology 14.1k
  • Anthropology 11.8k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 21.7k
Replace Royal Holloway University of London with:
Royal Holloway University of London United Kingdom
Aberystwyth University United Kingdom
Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle France
Liverpool John Moores University United Kingdom
École Pratique des Hautes Études France
Natural History Museum United Kingdom
Institute of Natural Sciences Belgium
Oxford Archaeology United Kingdom
University of Plymouth United Kingdom
National Oceanography Centre United Kingdom
British Museum relative to Royal Holloway University of London United Kingdom Royal Holloway University of London's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Royal Holloway University of London · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at British Museum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at British Museum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at British Museum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Museum more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at British Museum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with British Museum at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with British Museum at the time of their publication.

About British Museum

In recent decades, authors affiliated with British Museum have published 5.1k papers, which have received a total of 103.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 928 papers in Paleontology, 116 papers in Archeology, 115 papers in Space and Planetary Science, 791 papers in Archeology and 1.3k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (441 papers), Plant and animal studies (302 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (297 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (290 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (269 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (265 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (262 papers) and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (252 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (24.9k citations), Archeology (1.9k citations), Archeology (14.1k citations), Anthropology (11.8k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (21.7k citations). Authors at British Museum collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Nature, Bulletin of Entomological Research, Systematic Entomology, Journal of Archaeological Science and Archaeometry. Some of British Museum's most productive authors include Colin Patterson, Peter Andrews, Nigel E. Stork, G. O. Evans, Richard A. Fortey, S. M. Manton, Peter L. Forey, E. N. Arnold, Paul Henderson and John D. Taylor.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact