British Library

7.2k citations
960 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

British Library

672 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Peers

British Library
Comparison fields: 5 of 221
  • Library and Information Sciences 522
  • Conservation 605
  • Information Systems 1.3k
  • Space and Planetary Science 77
  • Linguistics and Language 246
Replace Bath Spa University with:
Bath Spa University United Kingdom
University of the Arts London United Kingdom
University of Wales Trinity Saint David United Kingdom
Centre de sociologie de l'innovation France
University of Suffolk United Kingdom
Bibliothèque Nationale de France France
Royal Danish Library Denmark
Education Scotland United Kingdom
Leverhulme Trust United Kingdom
Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine United Kingdom
British Library relative to Bath Spa University United Kingdom Bath Spa University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×23.7×
Bath Spa University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at British Library

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at British Library. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at British Library with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Library more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at British Library

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with British Library at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with British Library at the time of their publication.

About British Library

In recent decades, authors affiliated with British Library have published 960 papers, which have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 82 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 130 papers in Conservation, 25 papers in Space and Planetary Science, 3 papers in Medical Terminology and 279 papers in Information Systems on the topics of Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (148 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (125 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (101 papers), Library Science and Administration (60 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (39 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (36 papers), Research Data Management Practices (35 papers) and Conservation Techniques and Studies (34 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Library and Information Sciences (522 citations), Conservation (605 citations), Information Systems (1.3k citations), Space and Planetary Science (77 citations) and Linguistics and Language (246 citations). Authors at British Library collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including IFLA Journal, Aslib Journal of Information Management, World Patent Information, Journal of Documentation and Data Technologies and Applications. Some of British Library's most productive authors include Simone Curzio Bacchini, Maurice Bernard Line, Annabel Teh Gallop, Robert Perks, Alistair Thomson, Lyle Ungar, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed, Alexander Sandison, Michelle Poirier Brown and NEIL I. WARD.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact