American Type Culture Collection

706 papers receiving 26.4k citations

Peers

American Type Culture Collection
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 1.1k
  • Environmental Chemistry 1.9k
  • Microbiology 1.1k
  • Molecular Biology 11.8k
  • Ecology 4.5k
Replace High Throughput Biology (United States) with:
High Throughput Biology (United States) United States
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Canada
Virginia Sea Grant United States
Delaware Biotechnology Institute United States
Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology United States
Waterborne Environmental (United States) United States
Armand Frappier Museum Canada
Ohio Department of Agriculture United States
Human Genome Sciences (United States) United States
London Research and Development Centre Canada
American Type Culture Collection relative to High Throughput Biology (United States) United States High Throughput Biology (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.5×
High Throughput Biology (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at American Type Culture Collection

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American Type Culture Collection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American Type Culture Collection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Type Culture Collection more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at American Type Culture Collection

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American Type Culture Collection at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American Type Culture Collection at the time of their publication.

About American Type Culture Collection

In recent decades, authors affiliated with American Type Culture Collection have published 766 papers, which have received a total of 27.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 47 papers in Endocrinology, 5 papers in Microbiology, 38 papers in Microbiology, 374 papers in Molecular Biology and 33 papers in Parasitology on the topics of Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (96 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (63 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (60 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (46 papers), Protist diversity and phylogeny (45 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (43 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (35 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (35 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geochemistry and Petrology (1.1k citations), Environmental Chemistry (1.9k citations), Microbiology (1.1k citations), Molecular Biology (11.8k citations) and Ecology (4.5k citations). Authors at American Type Culture Collection collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Mycologia, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY, Cryobiology, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal and Genomics. Some of American Type Culture Collection's most productive authors include David Emerson, S. C. Jong, Thomas A. Nerad, Robert J. Hay, Timothy Lilburn, J. Patrick Megonigal, Shuh-Wei Hwang, Johanna V. Weiss, Crystal L. Moyer and C.L. Moyer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact