Institute of Plasma Physics

146.9k citations
8.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute of Plasma Physics

7.4k papers receiving 144.7k citations

Peers

Institute of Plasma Physics
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 36.1k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 20.8k
  • Waste Management and Disposal 12.9k
  • Water Science and Technology 20.0k
  • Materials Chemistry 61.4k
Replace Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics with:
Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics China
Hefei Institutes of Physical Science China
Institute of High Energy Physics China
Sinopec (China) China
Hefei National Center for Physical Sciences at Nanoscale China
Shanghai Advanced Research Institute China
Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures China
East China University of Technology China
National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory China
China Academy of Engineering Physics China
Institute of Plasma Physics relative to Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics China Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Plasma Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Plasma Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Plasma Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Plasma Physics more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Plasma Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Plasma Physics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Plasma Physics at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Plasma Physics

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Plasma Physics have published 8.0k papers, which have received a total of 146.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.8k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 2.3k papers in Aerospace Engineering, 2.9k papers in Materials Chemistry, 968 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 2.5k papers in Biomedical Engineering on the topics of Magnetic confinement fusion research (3.6k papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (2.2k papers), Fusion materials and technologies (2.0k papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (1.6k papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (927 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (618 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (596 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (499 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (36.1k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (20.8k citations), Waste Management and Disposal (12.9k citations), Water Science and Technology (20.0k citations) and Materials Chemistry (61.4k citations). Authors at Institute of Plasma Physics collaborate with scholars in China, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Fusion Engineering and Design, Nuclear Fusion, Physics of Plasmas, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity and Journal of Nuclear Materials. Some of Institute of Plasma Physics's most productive authors include Xiangke Wang, Changlun Chen, Jiaxing Li, Xiaoli Tan, Guixia Zhao, Dadong D. Shao, Xuemei Ren, Tasawar Hayat, Guodong Sheng and Yifei Wu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact