Austin Peay State University

24.7k citations
1.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Austin Peay State University

1.4k papers receiving 23.1k citations

Peers

Austin Peay State University
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Statistics and Probability 1.4k
  • Social Psychology 3.0k
  • Health 1.0k
  • Clinical Psychology 2.8k
  • Applied Psychology 610
Replace University of West Georgia with:
University of West Georgia United States
Singer (United States) United States
University of Central Arkansas United States
University of Illinois at Springfield United States
Northeastern Illinois University United States
Southeast Missouri State University United States
Valdosta State University United States
Indiana University South Bend United States
South University United States
Capital University United States
Austin Peay State University relative to University of West Georgia United States University of West Georgia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of West Georgia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Austin Peay State University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Austin Peay State University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Austin Peay State University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Austin Peay State University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Austin Peay State University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Austin Peay State University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Austin Peay State University at the time of their publication.

About Austin Peay State University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Austin Peay State University have published 1.7k papers, which have received a total of 24.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 59 papers in Numerical Analysis, 53 papers in Ceramics and Composites, 176 papers in Social Psychology, 10 papers in Theoretical Computer Science and 6 papers in Research and Theory on the topics of Phase-change materials and chalcogenides (64 papers), Glass properties and applications (53 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (51 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (39 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (34 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (31 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (31 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (31 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics and Probability (1.4k citations), Social Psychology (3.0k citations), Health (1.0k citations), Clinical Psychology (2.8k citations) and Applied Psychology (610 citations). Authors at Austin Peay State University collaborate with scholars in United States, Poland and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology and Psychometrika. Some of Austin Peay State University's most productive authors include Joel F. Lubar, Ayman ALZAATREH, Carl Lee, Felix Famoye, Samuel Nemsefor Jator, Fumiko Samejima, Folashade B. Agusto, Derek Richard Hopko, Joseph P. Maloney and Thomas A. Timmerman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact