Administración de Parques Nacionales

3.9k citations
294 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Administración de Parques Nacionales

256 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Administración de Parques Nacionales
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.4k
  • Ecological Modeling 398
  • Ecology 2.1k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.1k
  • Paleontology 269
Replace Wildlife Conservation Society Argentina with:
Wildlife Conservation Society Argentina Argentina
Universidad CLAEH Uruguay
Ministerio de Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca Uruguay
Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos Uruguay
Instituto Nacional del Agua Argentina
Instituto Patagonico para el Estudio de los Ecosistemas Continentales Argentina
Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos Argentina
National Monuments Council Chile
Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias Argentina
Centro de Ciencias Ambientales EULA-Chile de la Universidad de Concepción Chile
Administración de Parques Nacionales relative to Wildlife Conservation Society Argentina Argentina Wildlife Conservation Society Argentina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Wildlife Conservation Society Argentina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Administración de Parques Nacionales

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Administración de Parques Nacionales. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Administración de Parques Nacionales with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Administración de Parques Nacionales more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Administración de Parques Nacionales

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Administración de Parques Nacionales at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Administración de Parques Nacionales at the time of their publication.

About Administración de Parques Nacionales

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Administración de Parques Nacionales have published 294 papers, which have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 33 papers in Ecological Modeling, 84 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 157 papers in Ecology, 24 papers in Paleontology and 60 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (96 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (44 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (33 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (29 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (24 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (23 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (19 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (18 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.4k citations), Ecological Modeling (398 citations), Ecology (2.1k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.1k citations) and Paleontology (269 citations). Authors at Administración de Parques Nacionales collaborate with scholars in Argentina, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Biological Invasions, Oryx, Forest Ecology and Management, Polar Biology and Hydrobiologia. Some of Administración de Parques Nacionales's most productive authors include Thomas Kitzberger, Mónica Mermoz, Thomas T. Veblen, Javier Sanguinetti, Silvia Ortubay, Víctor Enrique Cussac, Guillermo José Martínez Pastur, Norma Inés Hilgert, María Vanessa Lencinas and Laura Fasola.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact