American Orchid Society

22.7k citations
677 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

American Orchid Society

576 papers receiving 18.6k citations

Peers

American Orchid Society
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Applied Psychology 1.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 2.8k
  • Social Psychology 2.9k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.8k
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 332
Replace Piedmont International University with:
Piedmont International University United States
University of Tennessee System United States
Anderson University - South Carolina United States
Washington School of Psychiatry United States
Palm Beach Atlantic University United States
Bennett Aerospace (United States) United States
Virginia Clinical Research United States
Clinical Research Solutions United States
Transylvania University United States
HOPE Clinic United States
American Orchid Society relative to Piedmont International University United States Piedmont International University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×83×
Piedmont International University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at American Orchid Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American Orchid Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American Orchid Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Orchid Society more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at American Orchid Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American Orchid Society at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American Orchid Society at the time of their publication.

About American Orchid Society

In recent decades, authors affiliated with American Orchid Society have published 677 papers, which have received a total of 22.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3 papers in Research and Theory, 27 papers in Dermatology, 4 papers in General Psychology, 3 papers in General Energy and 4 papers in Complementary and Manual Therapy on the topics of Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (18 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (16 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (14 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (13 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (11 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers), Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (10 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Psychology (1.5k citations), Clinical Psychology (2.8k citations), Social Psychology (2.9k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.8k citations) and Energy Engineering and Power Technology (332 citations). Authors at American Orchid Society collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, American Journal of Critical Care, Nanoscale, Journal of High Energy Physics and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. Some of American Orchid Society's most productive authors include Charles S. Carver, Michael F. Scheier, Annette M. La Greca, Wendy L. Stone, Julia F. Morton, Т. Н. Везироглу, Frano Barbir, et al, Suzanne D. Harris and Neil Schneiderman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact