American Orchid Society

20.6k citations
632 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

American Orchid Society

551 papers receiving 17.1k citations

Peers

American Orchid Society
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Applied Psychology 1.2k
  • Clinical Psychology 2.4k
  • Social Psychology 2.4k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 283
Replace Naples Anesthesia & Physician Associates with:
Naples Anesthesia & Physician Associates United States
Piedmont International University United States
University of Tennessee System United States
Savannah State University United States
Anderson University - South Carolina United States
Bennett Aerospace (United States) United States
Palm Beach Atlantic University United States
Washington School of Psychiatry United States
Virginia Clinical Research United States
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools United States
American Orchid Society relative to Naples Anesthesia & Physician Associates United States Naples Anesthesia & Physician Associates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×100×200×283×
Naples Anesthesia & Physician Associates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at American Orchid Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American Orchid Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American Orchid Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Orchid Society more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at American Orchid Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American Orchid Society at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American Orchid Society at the time of their publication.

About American Orchid Society

In recent decades, authors affiliated with American Orchid Society have published 632 papers, which have received a total of 20.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3 papers in Research and Theory, 26 papers in Dermatology, 4 papers in General Psychology, 3 papers in General Energy and 4 papers in Complementary and Manual Therapy on the topics of Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (17 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (15 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (13 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (13 papers), Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (10 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (10 papers), Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (10 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Applied Psychology (1.2k citations), Clinical Psychology (2.4k citations), Social Psychology (2.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations) and Energy Engineering and Power Technology (283 citations). Authors at American Orchid Society collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, American Journal of Critical Care, Nanoscale, Journal of High Energy Physics and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. Some of American Orchid Society's most productive authors include Charles S. Carver, Michael F. Scheier, Annette M. La Greca, Wendy L. Stone, Julia F. Morton, Т. Н. Везироглу, Frano Barbir, Suzanne D. Harris, et al and Blaine J. Fowers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact