The University of Adelaide

87.7k papers receiving 3.0M citations

Peers

The University of Adelaide
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 167.9k
  • Reproductive Medicine 62.4k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 51.8k
  • Plant Science 291.6k
  • Geophysics 101.1k
Replace The University of Melbourne with:
The University of Melbourne Australia
Monash University Australia
The University of Sydney Australia
University of South Australia Australia
UNSW Sydney Australia
La Trobe University Australia
Australian National University Australia
Flinders University Australia
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Australia
Deakin University Australia
The University of Adelaide relative to The University of Melbourne Australia The University of Melbourne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
The University of Melbourne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at The University of Adelaide

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at The University of Adelaide. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at The University of Adelaide with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The University of Adelaide more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at The University of Adelaide

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with The University of Adelaide at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with The University of Adelaide at the time of their publication.

About The University of Adelaide

In recent decades, authors affiliated with The University of Adelaide have published 99.4k papers, which have received a total of 3.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 969 papers in Periodontics, 377 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 3.0k papers in Geophysics, 1.3k papers in Paleontology and 1.2k papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology on the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (2.2k papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (1.3k papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (1.2k papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (1.1k papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1.0k papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (1.0k papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (952 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (891 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (167.9k citations), Reproductive Medicine (62.4k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (51.8k citations), Plant Science (291.6k citations) and Geophysics (101.1k citations). Authors at The University of Adelaide collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including The Medical Journal of Australia, PLoS ONE, Australian Dental Journal, Scientific Reports and Immunology and Cell Biology. Some of The University of Adelaide's most productive authors include Shi‐Zhang Qiao, Peng Shi, Mietek Jaroniec, JM Oades, Yao Zheng, Mark Tester, Chunhua Shen, Yan Jiao, Rana Munns and Robert J. Norman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact