Association for Computing Machinery

993 papers receiving 16.9k citations

Peers

Association for Computing Machinery
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
  • Software 1.5k
  • Computer Science Applications 1.7k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 1.4k
  • Information Systems 5.5k
  • Artificial Intelligence 5.5k
Replace Cambridge Scientific (United States) with:
Cambridge Scientific (United States) United States
Accenture (United States) United States
Cornell Tech United States
IBM (Canada) Canada
Information Technology Laboratory United States
Research!America (United States) United States
Kitware (United States) United States
Poughkeepsie Public Library District United States
MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory United States
InterDigital (United States) United States
Association for Computing Machinery relative to Cambridge Scientific (United States) United States Cambridge Scientific (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cambridge Scientific (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Association for Computing Machinery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Association for Computing Machinery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Association for Computing Machinery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Association for Computing Machinery more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Association for Computing Machinery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Association for Computing Machinery at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Association for Computing Machinery at the time of their publication.

About Association for Computing Machinery

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Association for Computing Machinery have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 18.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 82 papers in Software, 94 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 333 papers in Information Systems, 441 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 72 papers in Computer Science Applications on the topics of Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (99 papers), Software Engineering Research (83 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (67 papers), Topic Modeling (57 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (56 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (49 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (42 papers) and Advanced Database Systems and Queries (42 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Software (1.5k citations), Computer Science Applications (1.7k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (1.4k citations), Information Systems (5.5k citations) and Artificial Intelligence (5.5k citations). Authors at Association for Computing Machinery collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Communications of the ACM, interactions, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Language Resources and Evaluation and Science. Some of Association for Computing Machinery's most productive authors include Jeremy Roschelle, Richard Baskerville, Allen S. Lee, Karen A. Frenkel, Alistair Cockburn, Simson Garfinkel, Dorothy E. Denning, Martin Fowler, Krzysztof Czarnecki and Simon Helsen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact