American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 5%
- Nursing education and management
Papers in
- Top scholars
- Linda BellSarah A. DelgadoMaurene A. HarveyCarol RauenJustine MedinaBeth UlrichKaren R. SechristNola J. Pender
- Journals
- Critical Care Nurse (93 papers)Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing (23 papers)American Journal of Critical Care (14 papers)CHEST Journal (10 papers)JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
223 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 184
- Research and Theory 289
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 144
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 502
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 464
- Emergency Medical Services 548
Countries citing scholars working at American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American Association of Critical-Care Nurses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Association of Critical-Care Nurses more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American Association of Critical-Care Nurses at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American Association of Critical-Care Nurses at the time of their publication.
About American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
In recent decades, authors affiliated with American Association of Critical-Care Nurses have published 320 papers, which have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 10 papers in Research and Theory, 8 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 28 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 23 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 18 papers in Emergency Medical Services on the topics of Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (23 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (22 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (16 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (14 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (12 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (11 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (10 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Research and Theory (289 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (144 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (502 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (464 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (548 citations). Authors at American Association of Critical-Care Nurses collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Critical Care Nurse, Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, American Journal of Critical Care, CHEST Journal and JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. Some of American Association of Critical-Care Nurses's most productive authors include Linda Bell, Sarah A. Delgado, Maurene A. Harvey, Carol Rauen, Justine Medina, Linda Bell, Beth Ulrich, Karen R. Sechrist, Nola J. Pender and Susan Walker.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.