Federal Employment Agency

301 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Federal Employment Agency
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
  • Public Administration 366
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 324
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.1k
  • General Health Professions 860
  • Gender Studies 337
Replace CEPS/INSTEAD with:
CEPS/INSTEAD Luxembourg
Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training Germany
Hans Böckler Foundation Germany
European Trade Union Institute Belgium
Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space Germany
CBS University of Applied Sciences Germany
Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy Germany
International Zinc Association Belgium
Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology Netherlands
Institut für Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Germany
Federal Employment Agency relative to CEPS/INSTEAD Luxembourg CEPS/INSTEAD's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
CEPS/INSTEAD · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Federal Employment Agency

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Employment Agency. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Employment Agency with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Employment Agency more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Employment Agency

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Employment Agency at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Employment Agency at the time of their publication.

About Federal Employment Agency

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Employment Agency have published 376 papers, which have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 33 papers in Public Administration, 32 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 124 papers in General Health Professions, 107 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 78 papers in Political Science and International Relations on the topics of Social Policy and Reform Studies (62 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (60 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (47 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (34 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (33 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (32 papers), Social Policies and Healthcare Reform (28 papers) and Health and Medical Studies (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Public Administration (366 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (324 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.1k citations), General Health Professions (860 citations) and Gender Studies (337 citations). Authors at Federal Employment Agency collaborate with scholars in Germany, Bulgaria and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Journal for Labour Market Research, KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Intereconomics and Journal of Social Policy. Some of Federal Employment Agency's most productive authors include Cornelia Kristen, Nadia Granato, Lutz Bellmann, Florian Schulz, Daniela Grunow, Michael J. Fritsch, Thị Tuyết Trần, Udo Brixy, Hans‐Peter Blossfeld and Oliver Falck.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact