Theory of Dielectric Optical Waveguides
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- D. Marcuse
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9307313 →Countries where authors are citing Theory of Dielectric Optical Waveguides
This map shows the geographic impact of Theory of Dielectric Optical Waveguides. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theory of Dielectric Optical Waveguides with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory of Dielectric Optical Waveguides more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Theory of Dielectric Optical Waveguides
This network shows the impact of Theory of Dielectric Optical Waveguides. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Theory of Dielectric Optical Waveguides.
About Theory of Dielectric Optical Waveguides
This paper, published in 1974, received 838 indexed citations . Written by D. Marcuse covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (661 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (448 citations), Biomedical Engineering (91 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (65 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (58 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9307313.