Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes.
Impact in
- Ophthalmology 680
Classified as
- Authors
- Michael A. Lemp
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w88617331 →Countries where authors are citing Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes.
This map shows the geographic impact of Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes.
This network shows the impact of Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes..
About Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes.
This paper, published in 1995, received 1.5k indexed citations . Written by Michael A. Lemp covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.4k citations), Ophthalmology (680 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (561 citations), Immunology and Allergy (305 citations) and Dermatology (298 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w88617331.