Newton Methods for Nonlinear Problems: Affine Invariance and Adaptive Algorithms
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Peter Deuflhard
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w86757281 →Countries where authors are citing Newton Methods for Nonlinear Problems: Affine Invariance and Adaptive Algorithms
This map shows the geographic impact of Newton Methods for Nonlinear Problems: Affine Invariance and Adaptive Algorithms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Newton Methods for Nonlinear Problems: Affine Invariance and Adaptive Algorithms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Newton Methods for Nonlinear Problems: Affine Invariance and Adaptive Algorithms more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Newton Methods for Nonlinear Problems: Affine Invariance and Adaptive Algorithms
This network shows the impact of Newton Methods for Nonlinear Problems: Affine Invariance and Adaptive Algorithms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Newton Methods for Nonlinear Problems: Affine Invariance and Adaptive Algorithms.
About Newton Methods for Nonlinear Problems: Affine Invariance and Adaptive Algorithms
This paper, published in 2011, received 387 indexed citations . Written by Peter Deuflhard covering the research area of Numerical Analysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Mechanics (116 citations), Numerical Analysis (109 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (98 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (55 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (52 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w86757281.