A subdivision algorithm for computer display of curved surfaces.
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Edwin Catmull
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85599633 →Countries where authors are citing A subdivision algorithm for computer display of curved surfaces.
This map shows the geographic impact of A subdivision algorithm for computer display of curved surfaces.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A subdivision algorithm for computer display of curved surfaces. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A subdivision algorithm for computer display of curved surfaces. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A subdivision algorithm for computer display of curved surfaces.
This network shows the impact of A subdivision algorithm for computer display of curved surfaces.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A subdivision algorithm for computer display of curved surfaces..
About A subdivision algorithm for computer display of curved surfaces.
This paper, published in 1974, received 501 indexed citations . Written by Edwin Catmull covering the research area of Building and Construction, Geology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (379 citations), Computational Mechanics (277 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (259 citations), Geology (42 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (31 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85599633.