Where do we Stand on Maximum Entropy
Impact in
- Authors
- E. T. Jaynes
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w80896799 →Countries where authors are citing Where do we Stand on Maximum Entropy
This map shows the geographic impact of Where do we Stand on Maximum Entropy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Where do we Stand on Maximum Entropy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Where do we Stand on Maximum Entropy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Where do we Stand on Maximum Entropy
This network shows the impact of Where do we Stand on Maximum Entropy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Where do we Stand on Maximum Entropy.
About Where do we Stand on Maximum Entropy
This paper, published in 1979, received 511 indexed citations . Written by E. T. Jaynes. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (226 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (179 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (73 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (56 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (53 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w80896799.