The art of computer programming. Vol.3: Sorting and searching

472 indexed citations
published 1973
Journal
Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w72771002 →

Countries where authors are citing The art of computer programming. Vol.3: Sorting and searching

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The art of computer programming. Vol.3: Sorting and searching. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The art of computer programming. Vol.3: Sorting and searching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The art of computer programming. Vol.3: Sorting and searching more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The art of computer programming. Vol.3: Sorting and searching

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The art of computer programming. Vol.3: Sorting and searching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The art of computer programming. Vol.3: Sorting and searching.

About The art of computer programming. Vol.3: Sorting and searching

This paper, published in 1973, received 472 indexed citations . Written by Donald E. Knuth. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (238 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (171 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (127 citations), Signal Processing (89 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (53 citations). Published in Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w72771002.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact