On Measures of Entropy and Information

2.6k indexed citations
published 1961
Authors
A. Rényi
Journal
Project Euclid (Cornell University)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w68466652 →

Countries where authors are citing On Measures of Entropy and Information

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of On Measures of Entropy and Information. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by On Measures of Entropy and Information with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites On Measures of Entropy and Information more than expected).

Fields of papers citing On Measures of Entropy and Information

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of On Measures of Entropy and Information. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the On Measures of Entropy and Information.

About On Measures of Entropy and Information

This paper, published in 1961, received 2.6k indexed citations . Written by A. Rényi covering the research area of Management of Technology and Innovation and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (809 citations), Statistics and Probability (686 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (640 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (289 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (276 citations). Published in Project Euclid (Cornell University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w68466652.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact