Electromagnetic and acoustic scattering by simple shapes
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6340433 →Countries where authors are citing Electromagnetic and acoustic scattering by simple shapes
This map shows the geographic impact of Electromagnetic and acoustic scattering by simple shapes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Electromagnetic and acoustic scattering by simple shapes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electromagnetic and acoustic scattering by simple shapes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Electromagnetic and acoustic scattering by simple shapes
This network shows the impact of Electromagnetic and acoustic scattering by simple shapes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Electromagnetic and acoustic scattering by simple shapes.
About Electromagnetic and acoustic scattering by simple shapes
This paper, published in 1970, received 950 indexed citations . Written by John J. Bowman, Thomas B. A. Senior and Piergiorgio L. E. Uslenghi covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (590 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (458 citations), Biomedical Engineering (312 citations), Aerospace Engineering (269 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (124 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6340433.