Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control
Impact in
- Safety Research 201
- Authors
- Stuart Russell
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w59378488 →Countries where authors are citing Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control
This map shows the geographic impact of Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control
This network shows the impact of Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control.
About Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control
This paper, published in 2019, received 485 indexed citations . Written by Stuart Russell. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Safety Research (201 citations), Artificial Intelligence (148 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (134 citations), Sociology and Political Science (82 citations) and Information Systems (51 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w59378488.