Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory
Impact in
- Authors
- John A. SwetsRonald M. Pickett
- Journal
- Academic Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5922612 →Countries where authors are citing Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory
This map shows the geographic impact of Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory
This network shows the impact of Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory.
About Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory
This paper, published in 1982, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by John A. Swets and Ronald M. Pickett. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (168 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (151 citations), Statistics and Probability (119 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (105 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (94 citations). Published in Academic Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5922612.