Arterial assessment by Doppler-shift ultrasound.
Impact in
- Neurology 215
Classified as
- Authors
- R.G. GoslingD. H. King
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w53532086 →Countries where authors are citing Arterial assessment by Doppler-shift ultrasound.
This map shows the geographic impact of Arterial assessment by Doppler-shift ultrasound.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arterial assessment by Doppler-shift ultrasound. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arterial assessment by Doppler-shift ultrasound. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Arterial assessment by Doppler-shift ultrasound.
This network shows the impact of Arterial assessment by Doppler-shift ultrasound.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Arterial assessment by Doppler-shift ultrasound..
About Arterial assessment by Doppler-shift ultrasound.
This paper, published in 1974, received 560 indexed citations . Written by R.G. Gosling and D. H. King covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Neurology (215 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (150 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (135 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (75 citations) and Surgery (74 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w53532086.