Post-quantum key exchange - a new hope.

323 indexed citations
published 2015
Journal
IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w4929330 →

Countries where authors are citing Post-quantum key exchange - a new hope.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Post-quantum key exchange - a new hope.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Post-quantum key exchange - a new hope. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Post-quantum key exchange - a new hope. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Post-quantum key exchange - a new hope.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Post-quantum key exchange - a new hope.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Post-quantum key exchange - a new hope..

About Post-quantum key exchange - a new hope.

This paper, published in 2015, received 323 indexed citations . Written by Erdem Alkım, Léo Ducas, Thomas Pöppelmann and Peter Schwabe covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (310 citations), Information Systems (77 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (76 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (65 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (45 citations). Published in IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w4929330.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact