Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter

362 indexed citations
published 2009
Journal
Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w36041305 →

Countries where authors are citing Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter.

About Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter

This paper, published in 2009, received 362 indexed citations . Written by Lawrence J. Hall, Karsten Jedamzik, John March-Russell and Stephen M. West covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (359 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (282 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (29 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (7 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (4 citations). Published in Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w36041305.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact