Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Icrp
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3580484 →Countries where authors are citing Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60
This map shows the geographic impact of Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60
This network shows the impact of Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60.
About Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60
This paper, published in 1991, received 730 indexed citations . Written by Icrp covering the research area of Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (405 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (149 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (139 citations), Biomedical Engineering (113 citations) and Radiation (101 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3580484.