1 A Survey on Device-to-Device Communication in Cellular Networks
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w22696799 →Countries where authors are citing 1 A Survey on Device-to-Device Communication in Cellular Networks
This map shows the geographic impact of 1 A Survey on Device-to-Device Communication in Cellular Networks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by 1 A Survey on Device-to-Device Communication in Cellular Networks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites 1 A Survey on Device-to-Device Communication in Cellular Networks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing 1 A Survey on Device-to-Device Communication in Cellular Networks
This network shows the impact of 1 A Survey on Device-to-Device Communication in Cellular Networks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the 1 A Survey on Device-to-Device Communication in Cellular Networks.
About 1 A Survey on Device-to-Device Communication in Cellular Networks
This paper, published in 2016, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Arash Asadi, Qing Wang and Vincenzo Mancuso covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.2k citations), Computer Networks and Communications (1.0k citations), Aerospace Engineering (89 citations), Artificial Intelligence (44 citations) and Media Technology (44 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w22696799.