The Evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas
Impact in
- Paleontology 288
- Ecology 225
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w2194876 →Countries where authors are citing The Evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas
This map shows the geographic impact of The Evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas
This network shows the impact of The Evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas.
About The Evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas
This paper, published in 1985, received 489 indexed citations . covering the research area of Paleontology and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Paleontology (288 citations), Ecology (225 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (198 citations), Social Psychology (116 citations) and Genetics (59 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w2194876.