The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Taylor BaildonYilun Guan
- Journal
- eScholarship (California Digital Library)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w102559 →Countries where authors are citing The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters
This map shows the geographic impact of The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters
This network shows the impact of The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters.
About The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters
This paper, published in 2020, received 427 indexed citations . Written by Taylor Baildon and Yilun Guan covering the research area of Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (411 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (256 citations), Instrumentation (29 citations), Oceanography (22 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (17 citations). Published in eScholarship (California Digital Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w102559.