Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger Separable Solutions of Einstein’s Equations
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Brandon Carter
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf03399503 →Countries where authors are citing Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger Separable Solutions of Einstein’s Equations
This map shows the geographic impact of Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger Separable Solutions of Einstein’s Equations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger Separable Solutions of Einstein’s Equations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger Separable Solutions of Einstein’s Equations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger Separable Solutions of Einstein’s Equations
This network shows the impact of Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger Separable Solutions of Einstein’s Equations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger Separable Solutions of Einstein’s Equations.
About Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger Separable Solutions of Einstein’s Equations
This paper, published in 1968, received 686 indexed citations . Written by Brandon Carter covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Applied Mathematics and Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (600 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (557 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (194 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (66 citations) and Applied Mathematics (32 citations). Published in Communications in Mathematical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf03399503.