William Kerrigan

1.1k citations
43 papers · 335 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William Kerrigan

31 papers receiving 172 citations

Peers

William Kerrigan
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Literature and Literary Theory 115
  • Classics 34
  • Philosophy 67
  • History 43
  • History and Philosophy of Science 16
Replace J. Paul Hunter with:
J. Paul Hunter United States
John T. Shawcross United States
Angus FLETCHER
Desiderius Erasmus
Ronald Paulson United States
Sanford Budick
Gail Kern Paster United States
Michael A. Screech United Kingdom
Thomas Pfau United States
Terence Cave United States
William Kerrigan relative to J. Paul Hunter United States J. Paul Hunter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. Paul Hunter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Kerrigan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Kerrigan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Kerrigan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Kerrigan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Kerrigan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Kerrigan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Kerrigan. The network helps show where William Kerrigan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Kerrigan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Kerrigan Line = papers co-authored together William Kerrigan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198358
2 198439
3
The Complete Poetry and Essential Prose of John Milton
200736
4 199925
5
The idea of the Renaissance
198922
6
The prophetic Milton
197415
7 198613
8 197510
9 199610
10
Opening Texts: Psychoanalysis and the Culture of the Child
198510
11 202310
12 19879
13 20198
14 19868
15
The sacred complex
19837
16 20086
17 19896
18 19885
19 20004
20
Writing to the point: six basic steps
19744

About William Kerrigan

William Kerrigan is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Anthropology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and History, having authored 43 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (6 papers), American Jewish Fiction Analysis (3 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (3 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (3 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers), Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies (2 papers) and Digital Humanities and Scholarship (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (115 citations), Classics (34 citations), Philosophy (67 citations), History (43 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (16 citations). William Kerrigan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Joseph H. Smith, Gordon Braden, William B. Warner, John Milton, John Rumrich, Richard Shusterman, Paul A. Roth, Raman Selden, Barbara Kiefer Lewalski and Ahran Arnold. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Journal of American History, MLN, Texas Studies in Literature & Language and English Literary Renaissance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact