William Erdman

704 citations
23 papers · 513 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William Erdman

20 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

William Erdman
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 109
  • Nephrology 56
  • Cancer Research 115
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 117
  • Reproductive Medicine 40
Replace Metin Kır with:
Metin Kır Türkiye
Gonca Kara Gedi̇k Türkiye
Hani Rashid United States
Biray Caner Türkiye
Giulia David Italy
P. D. Peppercorn United Kingdom
Bumsoo Park South Korea
Regi Oommen India
Yonghui Chen China
Oktay Akça United States
William Erdman relative to Metin Kır Türkiye Metin Kır's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Metin Kır · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Erdman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Erdman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Erdman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Erdman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Erdman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Erdman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Erdman. The network helps show where William Erdman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Erdman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Erdman Line = papers co-authored together William Erdman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002116
2 200878
3 199870
4 199050
5 198941
6 201233
7
Comparison Between Tc-99m WBC SPECT/CT and MRI for the Diagnosis of Biopsy-proven Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.
201626
8 202021
9 199416
10 199713
11 200210
12
Local area networks in an imaging environment.
19868
13 19966
14 19956
15 19906
16 20124
17 19923
18 20102
19 19842
20 20051

About William Erdman

William Erdman is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Nephrology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (4 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (2 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Hematological disorders and diagnostics (2 papers) and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (109 citations), Nephrology (56 citations), Cancer Research (115 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (117 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (40 citations). William Erdman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas W. Burke, Charles Levenback, Michael T. Deavers, Ebrahim S. Delpassand, Robert L. Coleman, Wanrun Lin, David Brandon, Roberto Cardarelli, George N. Peters and Orhan K. Öz. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The Science of The Total Environment, Medical Physics and Journal of Endourology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact