Tim Smith

481 citations
11 papers · 359 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Child Abuse and Trauma
    • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health top 10%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence

Papers in

Tim Smith

10 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Tim Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Clinical Psychology 198
  • Health 62
  • Gender Studies 54
  • Safety Research 45
  • Soil Science 30
Replace Liu Meng with:
Liu Meng China
Jennifer Llewellyn Canada
Erin E. Burns United States
Laura Hammond United Kingdom
Jane Reeves United Kingdom
Chan Zhou China
Larissa L. Smith United States
Philippe Roy Canada
Kelly R. Wilson United States
Lilian Apaza Bolivia
Tim Smith relative to Liu Meng China Liu Meng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Liu Meng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Smith. The network helps show where Tim Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Tim Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Smith Line = papers co-authored together Tim Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1989214
2 201448
3 199827
4 201919
5 201914
6 201612
7 201411
8 201711
9 20182
10
Aluminum sensitivity and optimum Ca and pH requirement of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) clones used for forestry plantations in Australia.
20101
11 20110

About Tim Smith

Tim Smith is a scholar working on Ecology, Soil Science, Clinical Psychology, Biomaterials and Plant Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (3 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (2 papers), Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (1 paper), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (198 citations), Health (62 citations), Gender Studies (54 citations), Safety Research (45 citations) and Soil Science (30 citations). Tim Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jon R. Conte, Robert W. Jackson, R. Elizabeth Sockett, Neal W. Menzies, J. Bernhard Wehr, Alastair J. Younger, Barry H. Schneider, Paul Freeman, Gerald Grant and Alejandro Ramirez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pest Science, Journal of Forest Research, Forest Ecology and Management, BMC Microbiology and Microbial Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact