Thomas Sears

9.2k citations
118 papers · 7.9k · h-index 49

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Sears

111 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Peers

Thomas Sears
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 1.7k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 3.0k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 557
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.1k
  • Neurology 835
Replace David Miles Katz with:
David Miles Katz United States
George G. Somjen United States
David A. Ruggiero United States
Margaret T.T. Wong‐Riley United States
J.D. Coulter United States
Elspeth M. McLachlan Australia
A. Lundberg Sweden
Janusz Lipski New Zealand
Robert W. Porter United States
Yukihiko Yasui Japan
Thomas Sears relative to David Miles Katz United States David Miles Katz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
David Miles Katz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Sears

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Sears's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Sears with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Sears more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Sears

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Sears. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Sears. The network helps show where Thomas Sears may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Sears, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Sears Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Sears links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 118 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976340
2 1970331
3 1964326
4 1981303
5 1978291
6 1980279
7 1972271
8 1958238
9 1990238
10 1978203
11 1982200
12 1978194
13 1964186
14 1964181
15 1959172
16 1985168
17 1964147
18 1964141
19 1971136
20 1974135

About Thomas Sears

Thomas Sears is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 118 papers that have together received 7.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (31 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (23 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (16 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (9 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (1.7k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (3.0k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (557 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.1k citations) and Neurology (835 citations). Thomas Sears has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Kirkwood, Hugh Bostock, Per Normann Andersen, W. I. McDonald, David Stagg, John Carew Eccles, R. W. Gilliatt, Peter W. Nathan, Michael Rasminsky and R. H. Westgaard. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Nature, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact