Tânia Rocha

35 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Tânia Rocha
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 93
  • Occupational Therapy 64
  • Human-Computer Interaction 59
  • Computer Science Applications 31
  • Business and International Management 7
Replace Saba Kawas with:
Saba Kawas United States
Luis Salvador-Ullauri Ecuador
Venkatesh Potluri United States
Michael Crabb United Kingdom
Ather Sharif United States
Margaret Morgan United Kingdom
María José Martínez Segura Spain
Yasmine N. Elglaly United States
Lawrie Phipps United Kingdom
Luís Rivero Brazil
Tânia Rocha relative to Saba Kawas United States Saba Kawas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Saba Kawas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tânia Rocha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tânia Rocha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tânia Rocha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tânia Rocha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tânia Rocha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tânia Rocha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tânia Rocha. The network helps show where Tânia Rocha may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tânia Rocha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tânia Rocha Line = papers co-authored together Tânia Rocha links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201741
2 201532
3 201226
4 202320
5 201620
6 201519
7 201615
8 201512
9 20229
10 20238
11 20167
12 20167
13 20197
14 20257
15 20176
16 20196
17 20165
18 20164
19
USABILITY EVALUATION OF THE TOUCH SCREEN AND MOUSE AS INPUT DEVICES BY PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
20154
20 20174

About Tânia Rocha

Tânia Rocha is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Occupational Therapy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Education, having authored 43 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (18 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (12 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (10 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (4 papers), E-Government and Public Services (3 papers), Subtitles and Audiovisual Media (3 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (93 citations), Occupational Therapy (64 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (59 citations), Computer Science Applications (31 citations) and Business and International Management (7 citations). Tânia Rocha has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Taiwan and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Maximino Bessa, José Martins, Frederico Branco, Ramiro Gonçalves, Luciana Cabral, Luís Magalhães, Paulo Martins, Manuel Au‐Yong‐Oliveira, João Barroso and Leonel Morgado. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Indicators, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Sciences, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities and International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact