Stéphane Dion

3.9k citations
72 papers · 2.9k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Stéphane Dion

67 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Stéphane Dion
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.4k
  • Genetics 427
  • Public Administration 124
  • Molecular Biology 1.5k
  • Political Science and International Relations 496
Replace Jack Diamond with:
Jack Diamond Canada
David R. Archer United States
John Fitz United States
Daniel Gros Belgium
Patrick Dumont Luxembourg
Elizabeth Webster Australia
Ruth Dixon United Kingdom
Fiona Murray United States
Darren W. Davis United States
Qingjie Xia China
Stéphane Dion relative to Jack Diamond Canada Jack Diamond's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22.5×
Jack Diamond · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stéphane Dion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stéphane Dion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stéphane Dion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stéphane Dion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stéphane Dion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stéphane Dion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stéphane Dion. The network helps show where Stéphane Dion may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stéphane Dion, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stéphane Dion Line = papers co-authored together Stéphane Dion links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995336
2 1988317
3 1987297
4 1993275
5 1985146
6 1990143
7 1990134
8 1986114
9
The Budget-maximizing bureaucrat : appraisals and evidence
199191
10 198679
11 199662
12 200156
13 202253
14 199650
15 198950
16 198650
17 199049
18 199047
19 198740
20 199037

About Stéphane Dion

Stéphane Dion is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Genetics, having authored 72 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (15 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (15 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (12 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (9 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (8 papers), Canadian Identity and History (8 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (7 papers) and Political Systems and Governance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Genetics (427 citations), Public Administration (124 citations), Molecular Biology (1.5k citations) and Political Science and International Relations (496 citations). Stéphane Dion has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include D. Regoli, Guy Drapeau, Pedro D’Orléans-Juste, André Blais, Donald Blake, Nour‐Eddine Rhaleb, Réjean Couture, Jacques Mizrahi, Marie Thérèse Hosey and Vsevolod V. Gurevich. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, The Journal of Urology, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, Vaccine and PS Political Science & Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact