Scott Choi

16 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Scott Choi's Hit Papers

Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference 2010 · 869 citations
8690+5+10Years since publication250500750

Peers

Scott Choi
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Pharmacology 431
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 101
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 245
  • Research and Theory 9
  • Clinical Psychology 164
Replace Shizheng Du with:
Shizheng Du China
Britt‐Marie Stålnacke Sweden
Wen-Hung Chen United States
Cindy D. Scipio United States
James W. Atchison United States
Mary Ellen Jeans Canada
Jacquelyn S. Pennings United States
Javier Martínez-Calderón Spain
Amy J. Hoffman United States
Jordan Miller Canada
Scott Choi relative to Shizheng Du China Shizheng Du's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Shizheng Du · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Choi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Choi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Choi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Choi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Choi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Choi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Choi. The network helps show where Scott Choi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Choi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Choi Line = papers co-authored together Scott Choi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference
Hit paper breakdown →
2010869
2 200843
3 200942
4 200935
5 201627
6 201919
7 201917
8 20218
9 20208
10 20207
11 20244
12 20233
13 20002
14 20231
15 20221
16 19991
17 20091
18 20191

About Scott Choi

Scott Choi is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Surgery, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (1 paper), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper) and Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (431 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (101 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (245 citations), Research and Theory (9 citations) and Clinical Psychology (164 citations). Scott Choi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karon F. Cook, Dagmar Amtmann, Jin‐Shei Lai, Leigh F. Callahan, Mark P. Jensen, Dennis A. Revicki, David Cella, Nan Rothrock, Wen-Hung Chen and Francis J. Keefe. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Aging & Mental Health, Quality of Life Research and International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact