Sandra Rees

142 papers receiving 5.5k citations

Peers

Sandra Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 2.6k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 472
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 645
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 531
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 234
Replace David W. Walker with:
David W. Walker Australia
Jean Sands United Kingdom
Jonathan J. Hirst Australia
Sachio Takashima Japan
Stephen A. Back United States
Marjorie R. Grafe United States
Stefano Luisi Italy
Stéphane Sizonenko Switzerland
Daniel L. Marks United States
Harvey B. Sarnat Canada
Sandra Rees relative to David W. Walker Australia David W. Walker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David W. Walker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Rees. The network helps show where Sandra Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Rees Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 142 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005234
2 1995218
3 2002181
4 2000174
5 2011157
6 2002140
7 1998129
8 2007124
9 1994121
10 2007119
11 2007118
12 1997103
13 2011103
14 197398
15 201287
16 199985
17 200481
18 200780
19 199080
20 200780

About Sandra Rees

Sandra Rees is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 142 papers that have together received 5.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (56 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (28 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (22 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (20 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (18 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (12 papers) and Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (2.6k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (472 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (645 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (531 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (234 citations). Sandra Rees has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard Harding, Terrie E. Inder, Michelle Loeliger, Megan L. Cock, Sandra Dieni, Carina Mallard, Mary Tolcos, Jhodie R. Duncan, Terence J. O’Brien and David Copolov. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Research, Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, Brain Research, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience and Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact