Rosemary E. Booth

1.4k citations
12 papers · 1.2k · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics 4
    • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology 4
    • Rangeland and Wildlife Management 2

Rosemary E. Booth

12 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Rosemary E. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 392
  • Soil Science 244
  • Plant Science 579
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 292
  • Insect Science 182
Replace Walter Seidling with:
Walter Seidling Germany
Dominique Gillon France
Felisa Covelo Spain
Xuehua Ye China
Rauni Ohtonen Finland
M. Esther Pérez Corona Spain
Kelly M. Andersen United States
Tobias Ceulemans Belgium
Heidy Schimann France
Andréa Lúcia Teixeira de Souza Brazil
Rosemary E. Booth relative to Walter Seidling Germany Walter Seidling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Walter Seidling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rosemary E. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemary E. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemary E. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemary E. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemary E. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemary E. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemary E. Booth. The network helps show where Rosemary E. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rosemary E. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rosemary E. Booth Line = papers co-authored together Rosemary E. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2003331
2 2003226
3 2008174
4 2003107
5 2003104
6 200398
7 200777
8 200831
9 199610
10 19938
11
Vegetation composition and structure significantly influence green roof performance
20058
12 19932

About Rosemary E. Booth

Rosemary E. Booth is a scholar working on Soil Science, Ecology, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (2 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (2 papers), Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (1 paper), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (1 paper) and Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (392 citations), Soil Science (244 citations), Plant Science (579 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (292 citations) and Insect Science (182 citations). Rosemary E. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Philip Grime, David Read, Jonathan R. Leake, J. P. Grime, Nigel P. Dunnett, Ayako Nagase, Gareth K. Phoenix, Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse, Lucy Gilbert and David Wayne Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ecology, New Phytologist, Functional Ecology, Global Change Biology and European Journal of Soil Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact