Roberto Flore
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Insect Utilization and Effects
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Animal and Plant Science Education
Papers in
-
- Insect Utilization and Effects 5
-
- Animal and Plant Science Education 4
- Co-authors
- Afton Halloran (5 shared papers)Nanna Roos (3 shared papers)Paul Vantomme (3 shared papers)Michael Bom Frøst (5 shared papers)Yupa Hanboonsong (1 shared paper)Anne McBride (1 shared paper)Jørgen Eilenberg (2 shared papers)Annette Bruun Jensen (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Insects as Food and Feed (4 papers)International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science (3 papers)The Lancet Regional Health - Europe (1 paper)Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Roberto Flore
12 papers receiving 500 citations
Roberto Flore's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Insect Science 412
- Social Psychology 294
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 15
- Sensory Systems 30
- Marketing 57
Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Flore
This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Flore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Flore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Flore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Flore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Flore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Flore. The network helps show where Roberto Flore may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roberto Flore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 261 |
| 2 | 2015 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 10 | On Eating Insects:Essays, Stories and Recipes | 2017 | 8 |
| 11 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 2 |
About Roberto Flore
Roberto Flore is a scholar working on Insect Science, Social Psychology, Food Science, Sociology and Political Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Utilization and Effects (5 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (4 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (412 citations), Social Psychology (294 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (15 citations), Sensory Systems (30 citations) and Marketing (57 citations). Roberto Flore has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Afton Halloran, Nanna Roos, Paul Vantomme, Michael Bom Frøst, Yupa Hanboonsong, Anne McBride, Jørgen Eilenberg, Annette Bruun Jensen, Charlotte Payne and Paul Rozin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe and Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.