Robert B. Rutherford

26.9k citations
248 papers · 18.0k · 10 hit papers · h-index 52

Impact in

    • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Surgery top 0.05%
    • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
    • Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases

Papers in

    • Peripheral Artery Disease Management 44
    • Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases 16
    • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments 40
    • Vascular Procedures and Complications 33

Robert B. Rutherford

239 papers receiving 16.6k citations

Robert B. Rutherford's Hit Papers

Revision of the venous clinical severity score: Venous outcomes consensus statement: Special communication of the American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group 2010 · 334 citations
3340+11+23Years since publication50010001.5k2.0k2.5k

Peers

Robert B. Rutherford
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
  • Internal Medicine 2.2k
  • Surgery 9.2k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 6.2k
  • Emergency Medical Services 1.3k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.1k
Replace Mark G. Davies with:
Mark G. Davies United States
Anthony K.C. Chan Canada
Scott D. Grosse United States
William Hollingworth United Kingdom
David Gordon United States
Michael J Goldacre United Kingdom
James C. Torner United States
Abbas F. Jawad United States
Sara K. Vesely United States
Guy J. Maddern Australia
Robert B. Rutherford relative to Mark G. Davies United States Mark G. Davies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.4×
Mark G. Davies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert B. Rutherford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert B. Rutherford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert B. Rutherford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert B. Rutherford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert B. Rutherford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert B. Rutherford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert B. Rutherford. The network helps show where Robert B. Rutherford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert B. Rutherford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert B. Rutherford Line = papers co-authored together Robert B. Rutherford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 248 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: Revised version
Hit paper breakdown →
19972665
2
Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
Hit paper breakdown →
20021431
3
Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statement
Hit paper breakdown →
20041334
4
Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC).
Hit paper breakdown →
20001220
5
Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms
Hit paper breakdown →
1991892
6
Recommended standards for reports dealing with arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses
Hit paper breakdown →
2002699
7
Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease.
Hit paper breakdown →
2007612
8
Venous severity scoring: An adjunct to venous outcome assessment
Hit paper breakdown →
2000555
9
Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
Hit paper breakdown →
2002512
10
Revision of the venous clinical severity score: Venous outcomes consensus statement: Special communication of the American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group
Hit paper breakdown →
2010334
11 1996321
12 2009263
13 1988256
14 2007231
15 1993214
16 2005209
17 1997198
18 1999181
19
Meckel's diverticulum: a review of 148 pediatric patients, with special reference to the pattern of bleeding and to mesodiverticular vascular bands.
1966169
20 1988162

About Robert B. Rutherford

Robert B. Rutherford is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education, having authored 248 papers that have together received 18.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peripheral Artery Disease Management (44 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (40 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (33 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (31 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (29 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (24 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (16 papers) and Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (2.2k citations), Surgery (9.2k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (6.2k citations), Emergency Medical Services (1.3k citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.1k citations). Robert B. Rutherford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Dormandy, Darrell N. Jones, Calvin B. Ernst, K.W. Johnston, J.Dennis Baker, John M. Porter, Sam S. Ahn, Mark H. Meissner, Gregory L. Moneta and Frank T. Padberg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, Behavioral Disorders, Seminars in Vascular Surgery, Education and Treatment of Children and Journal of Surgical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact