R.H. Mitchell

758 citations
12 papers · 637 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Geophysics top 5%
    • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Biophysics top 5%
    • Electron Spin Resonance Studies

Papers in

R.H. Mitchell

12 papers receiving 615 citations

Peers

R.H. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Geophysics 407
  • Biophysics 85
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 48
  • Condensed Matter Physics 50
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 48
Replace Isamu Shinno with:
Isamu Shinno Japan
Gary A. Novak United States
Sanda M. Botis Canada
J. A. Weil Canada
Kazuake Iishi Japan
Heinz Wengeler Germany
Alexej N. Platonov Ukraine
Aaron C. Palke United States
E. Huang Taiwan
A. I. Nepomnyashchikh Russia
R.H. Mitchell relative to Isamu Shinno Japan Isamu Shinno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.1×
Isamu Shinno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.H. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.H. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.H. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.H. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.H. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.H. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.H. Mitchell. The network helps show where R.H. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside R.H. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.H. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together R.H. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2005372
2 1998115
3 200262
4 198640
5 199815
6 19967
7 19736
8
Moessbauer spectra of priderite and synthetic iron-bearing hollandite
19996
9 20016
10 19903
11 20023
12 19862

About R.H. Mitchell

R.H. Mitchell is a scholar working on Biophysics, Condensed Matter Physics, Geochemistry and Petrology, Geophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 637 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electron Spin Resonance Studies (4 papers), Mineralogy and Gemology Studies (2 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (2 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (2 papers), Crystallography and Radiation Phenomena (1 paper), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (1 paper), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (1 paper) and Magnetic Properties of Alloys (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (407 citations), Biophysics (85 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (48 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (50 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (48 citations). R.H. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include P. C. Riedi, GRAHAM M. SMITH, J. C. G. Lesurf, Anton R. Chakhmouradian, Ekaterina P. Reguir, J. G. M. Armitage, P. Mohn, Thomas Dumelow, J.S. Abell and Karlheinz Schwarz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, Cryogenics, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, Analytical Biochemistry and Journal of Modern Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact